The saints who intrigue me the most are the ones whose biographies start out something like this: "Not much is known about Saint Joe Schmo..." It's as if their entire lives are empty chalkboards, and, yet, they're regarded holy enough to be saints. That's astounding to me. That would be like me winning the Nobel Prize in Literature because the members of the Swedish Academy heard from a friend's cousin that I'm a good writer. It just doesn't work that way.

That's not a very comforting thought. To be honest, it scares the shit out of me. I guess I haven't quite left behind the ten-year-old boy who wanted to be the next Stephen King. I can't shake the fantasy that, one day, some huge literary agent is going to stumble across my blog and send me an e-mail with these words in the subject line: "YOU ARE THE BE$T WRITER I'VE EVER READ! PLEA$E LET ME REPRE$ENT YOU!" Or something like that. I'm not sure if this scenario is a reflection of my stubborn refusal to accept reality or a genuine possibility for a lucrative, successful writing career. I just don't want to give up my dream, because, without my dream, I'm just one step away from being Al Bundy in my own version of Married With Children.
Which brings me back to my original question of what my legacy is going to be, the thing or things for which I'm going to be remembered. If I'm remembered at all. I'm not a saint. I will never be a saint. I can't imagine doing anything for a sustained period that even remotely resembles being saintly. Let me give you an example: today's feast is for Namatius, a man who was the Bishop of Clermont, France, in the 400s. Namatius and his wife (yes, Catholic bishops were allowed to marry at one time) are best known for building cathedrals filled with beautiful artwork. His wife created the Bible of the Poor--"sacred images figuratively transcribed from the revealed texts." Basically, she created picture book Bibles on church walls for the illiterate poor. By the way, none of this information is first-hand. This stuff comes from stories told by Saint Gregory of Tours about Namatius and his wife, which, in my book, is like being nominated for sainthood by a nephew of the chief saint-maker committee guy. (There's an actual title, I believe, but you get the idea.) The point is: legacy is tied to memory, and memory is subject to human failings (like too many Jell-O shots at a Halloween party). I'm not saying Saint Gregory got it wrong on Namatius. He probably didn't. But who's to know?
So, I'm just going to keep writing my posts, taking care of my family, and dreaming. Who knows what could happen? I don't think there's a patron saint for bloggers yet. Now I just have to find someone to nominate me after I'm gone.
You know, the nephew of that chief saint-maker committee guy.